Sustainable development goals towards eco-innovation: A survey Brazil

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47842/juts.v5i1.41

Palavras-chave:

Development goals, Sustainable development goals, Eco-innovation, Brazil

Resumo

Objective: To analyze the relationship between the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and eco-innovation, in the perception of 1,262 Brazilian respondents. Method: The methodology used was quantitative and descriptive research through confirmatory factor analysis and multiple linear regression. Main results: The results highlight that all SDGs influence eco-innovation. However, the most relevant relationship occurred between the variables of Sustainable Development Goals 17 (Partnerships to achieve the goal) and eco-innovation. Relevance/originality: The research's originality lies in providing an analysis framework, statistically validated (observable variables and constructs). Thus, the Framework proposed in the research can be replicated in different regional, national, and international contexts. Theoretical/methodological contributions: Theoretical contributions are linked to the development of the scale to measure the 17 SDGs, based on environmental, social, and economic precepts. Social/management contributions: The managerial and social contributions of the survey allow managers and related professionals to become aware of the importance of the SDGs, helping them with strategies for sustainable development. In addition to information for socio-environmental actions of public policies at regional and national levels, to support cities and regions in complying with the 2030 Agenda.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Eliana Andréa Severo, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Pernambuco, (Brasil)

Pós-Doutora em Administração pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul - UCS, Rio Grande do Sul, (Brasil). Doutora em Administração pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Rio Grande do Sul e pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul - UCS. Professora da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Pernambuco, no Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas (CCSA) do Departamento de Ciências Administrativas (DCA).

Julio Cesar Ferro De Guimarães, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Pernambuco, (Brasil)

Pós-Doutorado pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul - UCS, Rio Grande do Sul, (Brasil). Doutor em Administração pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Rio Grande do Sul,  e pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul  - UCS. 

Natália Queiroz da Silva Oliveira, Faculdade Católica do Rio Grande do Norte - FCRN, Rio Grande do Norte, (Brasil)

Mestrado em Administração pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará - UECE, Ceará, (Brasil). Graduação em Administração pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará - - UECE. Professora da Faculdade Católica do Rio Grande do Norte – FCRN.

Referências

ALOS-SIMO, L.; VERDU-JOVER, A.; GOMEZ-GRAS, J. M. Does activity sector matter for the relationship between eco-innovation and performance? Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 263, p. 21544, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121544

ARORA, N. K. Earth: 50 years challenge. Environmental Sustainability, v. 2, p. 1-3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00053-5

ARORA, N. K.; FATIMA, T.; MISHRA, I.; VERMA, M.; MISHRA, J.; MISHRA, V. Environmental sustainability: challenges and viable solutions. Environmental Sustainability, v. 1, n. 309-340, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-00038-w

ARRANZ, N.; ARROYABE, M. F.; MOLINA-GARCÍA, A.; DE ARROYABE, J. F. Incentives and inhibiting factors of eco-innovation in the Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 220, p. 167-176, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.126

BAI, Y.; OCHUODHO, T. O.; YANG, J. Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecological Indicators, v. 102, p. 51-64, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079

BARBIERI, R.; SANTOS, D. F. L., Sustainable business models and eco-innovation: A life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 266, p. 121954, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121954

BENROMDHANE, S. A. Energy efficiency through integrated environmental management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 22, n. 10, p. 7973-7979, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4424-8

BRUNDTLAND, G. H. Report of the World Commission on environment and development:" our common future.". United Nations, 1987.

CAI, W.; LI, G. The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 176, p. 110-118, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109

CASTOR, J.; BACHA, K.; NERINI, F. F. SDGs in action: A novel framework for assessing energy projects against the sustainable development goals. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 68, p. 101556, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101556

CHEN, J.; CHENG, J.; DAI, S. Regional eco-innovation in China: An analysis of eco-innovation levels and influencing factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 153, p. 1-14, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.141

CHENG, C. C., SHIU, E. C. Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective. Technovation, v. 2, n. 6, p. 329-344, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.001

COLOMBO, L. A.; PANSERA, M., OWEN, R. The discourse of eco-innovation in the European Union: An analysis of the eco-innovation action plan and horizon 2020. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 214, p. 653-665, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.150

DNPM. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral. Sumário Mineral 2015. Brasília: Dnpm/Diplam, 2015.

GARCÍA-GRANERO, E. M.; PIEDRA-MUÑOZ, L.; GALDEANO-GÓMEZ, E. Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 191, p. 304-317, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.215

GARCÍA-GRANERO, E. M.; PIEDRA-MUÑOZ, L.; GALDEANO-GÓMEZ, E. Measuring eco-innovation dimensions: The role of environmental corporate culture and commercial orientation. Research Policy, v. 49, n. 8, p. 104028, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104028

HAIR Jr., J. F.; BLACK, W. C.; BABIN, B. J.; ANDERSON, R. E. Multivariate data analysis. Pearson new international edition. Pearson Higher Ed, 2013.

HÁK, T.; JANOUŠKOVÁ, S.; MOLDAN, B. Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, v. 60, p. 565-573, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003

HE, F.; MIAO, X.; WONG, C. W.; LEE, S. Contemporary corporate eco-innovation research: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 502-526, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.314

IPEA. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Agenda 2030. ODS – Metas Nacionais dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Silva, E. R. A. (Coord.). Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão, 2018.

IPEA. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Atlas da Violência. Cerqueira, D. (Coord.). Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Brasília: Rio de Janeiro: São Paulo, 2019.

KANDA, W.; DEL RÍO, P.; HJELM, O.; BIENKOWSKA, D. A technological innovation systems approach to analyse the roles of intermediaries in eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 227, p. 1136-1148, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.230

KUO, T-C; SMITH, S. A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 192, p. 207-220, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212

LANDRIGAN, P. J.; FULLER, R.; ACOSTA, N. J.; ADEYI, O.; ARNOLD, R.; BALDÉ, A. B.; CHILES, T. The lancet commission on pollution and health. The Lancet, v. 391, n. 10119, p. 462-512, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0

LEE, J.; SPRATLING, R. Recruiting mothers of children with developmental disabilities: adaptations of the snowball sampling technique using social media. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, v. 33, n. 1, p. 107-110, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.09.011

LIN, Z.; WANG, S.; YANG, L. Motivating innovation alliance's environmental performance through eco-innovation investment in a supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 269, p. 122361, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122361

LIU, Y.; NDUBISI, N. O.; LIU, Y.; BARRANE, F. Z. New product development and sustainable performance of Chinese SMMEs: The role of dynamic capability and intra-national environmental forces. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 230, p. 107817, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107817

MAJAVA, J.; LEVIÄKANGAS, P.; KINNUNEN, T.; KESS, P.; FOIT, D. Spatial health and life sciences business ecosystem: a case study of San Diego. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 19, n. 1, p. 26-46, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2015-0003

MARÍN-VINUESA, L. M.; SCARPELLINI, S.; PORTILLO-TARRAGONA, P.; MONEVA, J. M. The impact of eco-innovation on performance through the measurement of financial resources and green patents. Organization & Environment, v. 33, n. 2, p. 285-310, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618819103

MARTÍN, E. G.; GIORDANO, R.; PAGANO, A.; VAN DER KEUR, P.; COSTA, M. M. Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals. Science of The Total Environment, v. 738, p. 139693, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693

MILICA, Đ.; MILICA, J. Productive Employment and Working Conditions as Determinants of Sustainable Economic Development in Serbia. Studies in Business and Economics, v. 14, n. 3, p. 84-96, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2019-0045

MIKULČIĆ, H.; DUIĆ, N.; DEWIL, R. Environmental management as a pillar for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 203, n. 3, p. 867-871, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.040

MIKULČIĆ, H.; DUIĆ, N.; SCHLÖR, H.; DEWIL, R. Troubleshooting the problems arising from sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 32, p. 52-57, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.080

MONTEIRO, N. B. R.; DA SILVA, E. A.; NETO, J, M. M. Sustainable development goals in mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 228, p. 509-520, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.332

Sustainable Development Goals. SDG. 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/> Acesso em: 25 Ago. de 2019.

NAÇÕES UNIDAS BRASIL. 2015. Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Disponível em: <https://nacoesunidas.org/pos2015/ >. Acesso em: 07 Mai de 2019.

PHILIPPIDIS, G.; SHUTES, L.; M'BAREK, R.; RONZON, T.; TABEAU, A.; VAN MEIJL, H. Snakes and ladders: World development pathway's synergies and trade-offs through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 267, p. 122147, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122147

PORTO DIGITAL. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.portodigital.org/parque/gestao-do-parque/missao?nv1=parque&nv2=gestao-do-parque&nv3=missao>. Acesso em: 15 Jul. de 2020.

RATTEN, V. Eco-innovation and competitiveness in the Barossa Valley wine region. Competitiveness Review, v. 28, n. 3, p. 318-331, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2017-0002

ROCHA, R. M., CÂMARA, M. R., Prediction, monitoring and management of detrimental algal blooms on solar salt production in north-east Brazil. In: SEVENTH SYMP. Salt. P. 657-660, 1993.

SCARPELLINI, S.; VALERO‐GIL, J.; MONEVA, J. M.; ANDREAUS, M. Environmental management capabilities for a “circular eco‐innovation”. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1850-1864, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2472

SCHLEICHER, J.; SCHAASFSMA, M.; VIRA, B. Will the Sustainable development goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment? Environmental Sustainability, v. 34, p. 43-47, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004

SEBESTYÉN, V.; BULLA, M.; RÉDEY, Á.; ABONYI, J. Network model-based analysis of the goals, targets and indicators of sustainable development for strategic environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 238, p. 126-135, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.096

SEYFANG, G.; SMITH, A. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, v. 16, n. 4, p. 584-603, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121

SEVERO, E. A.; GUIMARAES, J. C. F. Antecedent and consequents of eco-innovation for sustainability: generations' perceptions in Brazil and Portugal. International Journal of Professional Business Review, v. 7, n.1, p. 1-30, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i1.280

SEVERO, E. A.; DE GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; DORION, E. C. H. Cleaner production, social responsibility and eco-innovation: generations' perception for a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 186, p. 91-103, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.129

SHEN, J.; ZHANG, X.; LV, Y.; YANG, X.; WU, J.; LIN, L.; ZHANG, Y. An improved emergy evaluation of the environmental sustainability of China’s steel production from 2005 to 2015. Ecological Indicators, v. 103, p. 55-69, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.051

SILVESTRE, B. S.; ŢÎRCĂ, D. M. Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 208, p. 325-332, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244

SINAKOU, E.; BOEVE-DE PAUW, J.; GOOSSENS, M.; VAN PETEGEM, P. Academics in the field of Education for Sustainable Development: Their conceptions of sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 184, p. 321-332, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.279

SZOPIK-DEPCZYŃSKA, K.; CHEBA, K.; BĄK, I.; STAJNIAK, M.; SIMBOLI, A.; IOPPOLO, G. The study of relationship in a hierarchical structure of EU sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, v. 90, p. 120-131, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.002

YANG, Y.; HOLGAARD, E. J. The important role of civil society groups in eco-innovation: a triple helix perspective. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, v. 4, n. 2, p. 132-148, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17561411211235730

WANG, L.; CHANG, H. L.; RIZVI, S. K. A.; SARI, A. Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries?. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 270, p. 110829, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110829

Downloads

Publicado

2022-10-05

Como Citar

SEVERO, E. A.; DE GUIMARÃES, J. C. F.; OLIVEIRA, N. Q. da S. Sustainable development goals towards eco-innovation: A survey Brazil. Journal of Urban Technology and Sustainability, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. e41, 2022. DOI: 10.47842/juts.v5i1.41. Disponível em: https://journaluts.emnuvens.com.br/journaluts/article/view/41. Acesso em: 19 maio. 2025.

Edição

v. 5 n. 1 (2022): Continuous publication

Seção

Artigos

Categorias

Licença

Copyright (c) 2022 Eliana Andréa Severo, Julio Cesar Ferro De Guimarães, Natália Queiroz da Silva Oliveira

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;

O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;

O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);

A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);

É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC